Jun 072010
 

Naming a child is hard when there are but two parents. Up the number of concerned parties and the angst over naming grows exponentially more intense.

My son left the the hospital with a standard complement of names provided by his mother. N. used them in the weeks they lived together; later we used them in the months he lived with but was not yet related to us. Not even one of those names would we have chosen on our own, especially as the final one was provided by N.’s partner at the time of the birth — a man who made neither genetic contribution to the boy nor financial contribution to his mother. Ever.

When the time came to make the boy a legal member of the family we were faced with a conundrum: Given that he had to bear our last name, should we truncate the names he came with so that he’d have the typical number and no more? Could we compress them somehow? Was there a way to incorporate his birthmother’s surname as we’d done for his sister? Did we have an obligation to keep his original last name considering that there was no genetic tie? And what of the names we’d dreamed of using for boy-children? Did our desires have to be pushed aside in this aspect of adoption too?

I won’t detail the process of negotiation, pouting and passive-aggressive behavior everyone endured before reaching a decision; suffice it to say that my boy now groans under a weight of names the likes of which even British monarchy cannot bear. We took nothing from him. We only added, with the reasoning that someday he can explain or ignore any of the names as he sees fit.

Thank science I’ll never have to go through that again, I thought four years ago, but my thanks were premature. Emboldened perhaps by our willingness to keep her preferred names, N. made a similar request when choosing parents for her latest child. Were they blinded by baby-lust when they agreed without question to the names she wanted? Perhaps, because as soon as she selected them they began waffling.

It was because they didn’t understand, they claimed, and thus they let their hearts fix on a simplified spelling of the child’s first name. They avoided the topic during pre-birth doctor’s visits and at the hospital; once the infant was installed in their home and they began using the shortened spelling of her name, they hoped N. would never learn — or would only learn years later — that they’d gone against her wishes.

N.’s arrival on Facebook changed all that. I awoke one morning to angry, worried emails from both mothers. How did you handle naming, the one asked. Why aren’t they being honest with me? said the other. What are we supposed to do? continued the first.

If I hadn’t taken a long pause my answer would have been far harsher than it was. She carried your child for nine months, gave birth to her, then handed her to you and now you can’t even honor her spelling request, I wanted to ask. Instead I suggested calm and compromise: Could you use the original spelling on the birth certificate and the simplified spelling elsewhere? Keep the name supplied by N’s current partner even though there is no genetic tie? Can you give the nod to N.’s wishes as they are motivated only by love?

Impossible, replied the new mother. She didn’t want to confuse the child or her future teachers with multiple spellings and she certainly didn’t want her bearing the name of a man to whom she had no blood ties. Um, I held myself back from saying. You do remember that she also has no blood ties to you?

We don’t have to show N. the birth certificate, do we? she asked. Maybe we’ll just let her think we used her names and make sure N. never sees that piece of paper. I didn’t hold back from answering that. Woman, you are building a relationship you hope will last for many years, including a time when your daughter can read her own birth certificate and call her birthmother with no help or permission from you. Do you really want to have to explain then that you lied?

“I just want her to know that she had people who loved her even before she was born,” N. said to me later. Can you write her a letter, I suggested. Tell her how you came up with her names, then put it in a safe spot so that you can give it to her when she’s older?

This is all I can say to them; in fact it is far more than I should have said, as every instance of interference on my part deprives them of the chance to build this relationship for themselves.

 

From time to time someone gets cranky about an aspect of our insular little world and pops off a comment referencing the “in” group of sex-bloggers, whose members they invariably characterize as sycophantic, humorless and exclusive. Every time this happens I have to shake my head because in nearly five years of writing in this genre, I have not yet met such a creature.

Who are its members? Where are its members? What passwords or secret handshakes exist to grant one entrance? I don’t know! I’ve never heard of anyone who does know, nor even a breath of a whisper of a hint that would suggest the reality of this “in” group, and you know why? Because there is no “in” group. There are, however, many of us who feel passionately about certain topics, including two or three which have caused quite a kerfuffle lately — and rightly so.

The glorious interconnectedness of the ‘net means that if you post a blog about a topic abhorrent to me and I’m hosting your ad, your assholery rubs off on me. I look like a jerk by proxy, and trust me when I say that I do a fine enough job of looking like a jerk without anyone else’s help.

This phenomena seems to be getting more pronounced as Twitter, Facebook and other social media draw us into an ever more tightly woven network. The growing pains are sharp but they’re not nearly over. Companies have to be more cognizant than ever about how they look to their customers:

So what is the point of all this?  The point is, FORGET YOUR BRAND.  You don’t own it because it is literally nothing.  You can spend all sorts of time and money trying to manufacture public opinion, but ultimately, that’s up to the public, now isn’t it?

You know the best way to get the public to respect your brand?  Have a respectable brand.  Offer a great, innovative product and make responsible, ethical business decisions.

I’ll add this: When you fuck up — and we all fuck up — have the ovaries to admit it. Face your failure, apologize for the misstep and promise to make things right. Look, it’s dead simple:

  • “Our current linking strategy really isn’t building the kind of collaboration we want to encourage. Give us a week to reevaluate, during which we’d love to have your constructive feedback in our forums; at the end of this time we’ll roll out a new policy that will be fair to everyone.”
  • “Our company makes products specifically designed to help people explore and enjoy their sexuality no matter what their body type. We’re saddened and embarrassed to have posted an article that suggests otherwise. We have removed the piece in question and in the future we’ll hire more qualified writers and better vet their work before allowing it on our site.”
  • “After receiving an enormous amount of feedback on this topic we’ve come to the conclusion that linking to someone who put a bounty on sex workers was ill-advised at best. We’re proud to fight for sex-workers’ safety and human rights, and in the future we’ll do better to respond to their concerns promptly.”

Kindergartners know to do this when they’re wrong. CEOs should follow their example.

Should companies about-face with every complaint? Not hardly. But when dozens or hundreds start flowing in, it’s time to realize that those messages come not from anonymous nobodies but actual human beings who may in fact work in the very fields they’re critiquing and who quite literally put food on your table and a roof over your head. Consumers have more ability than ever to know you and contact you. Expect to be held accountable. Expect it if you are a blogger writing to an audience of dozens or if you are the President of a Fortune 500 company.

Do your opinions on these topics differ from mine? That’s ok. Economics being what they are right now, I cannot condemn anyone who keeps their ties to a company I’ve criticized. It’s hard to turn down affiliate checks no matter how small; it’s even harder to contemplate giving up full-time employment based on the experiences others have had. Affiliate away. Work away. But for the love of God have an exit strategy because my gut and overwhelmingly ample evidence tells me that sooner or later you will need it.

You don’t need an “in” crowd to tell you that.

 

This explains so much:

Psychologists have discovered that self-control is an exhaustible resource. And I don’t mean self-control only in the sense of turning down cookies or alcohol, I mean a broader sense of self-supervision—any time you’re paying close attention to your actions, like when you’re having a tough conversation or trying to stay focused on a paper you’re writing. This helps to explain why, after a long hard day at the office, we’re more likely to snap at our spouses or have one drink too many—we’ve depleted our self-control.

read the rest of the study here

Jun 032010
 

I crowdsourced Twitter the other day wondering if OKCupid would be a good dating site for me. Given that responses were mostly positive, I reactivated my long-dormant account in the hope of making some new friends.

At first that seemed like a real possibility as I was greeted by an inbox stuffed full of responses, but when I started reading through the responses I found this charming missive:

And I just don’t know what to be the most taken aback by: the fictitious assertion that I requested a Brad Pitt type, the horrifying sexual fantasy or the fact that he thought this was something missing from my — or any other woman’s — life.

Jun 022010
 

Every day I am asked to be a little stronger than the day before. Every day I feel like I’ll fail. So far I haven’t, but each time 10am finds me hunched over the sink sobbing so hard I know breakfast’s going to make a reappearance I doubt my ability not to fail the next time the pressure ramps up.

If I were religious I would gladly fall into the arms of the promise that God only gives us what we can handle. Alas I am not, so I cannot believe that an invisible father gives me trouble in pieces cut small enough to chew but not choke. No, they come instead in a punishing rush that neither knows nor cares if I’m able to manage.

I’ve made a name as The One Who Can Handle Everything, and the people in my life have become used to me Not Making a Fuss no matter how badly things break. Stoic, I’d rather calmly answer, Missing arm? What missing arm? Oh that missing arm. Right, it was a shark. Nothing really, instead of the rank emo screaming through my head, the emo which would like nothing more than to weep and pound and gnash teeth and (most importantly) be comforted and told that it’s all going to work out just fine.

It will work out. It always works out, or rather I always make it work out, but I would so like to hear someone stronger than me say so while stroking my hair and rubbing my back and kissing the top of my head and in general giving me the comfort I hand out to so many others.

I had it before. I don’t have it now. Maybe at some unbearably distant point in the future I’ll have it again. Until then I’m just going to have to muddle through my own.

Man can will nothing unless he has first understood that he must count on no one but himself;
that he is alone, abandoned on earth in the midst of his infinite responsibilities, without help, with no other
aim than the one he sets himself, with no other destiny than the one he forges for himself on this earth.
–Jean-Paul Sartre

 

After nearly three years spent with one person, the prospect of gearing up for another round of coffee dating filled me with something just shy of dread. I won’t lie; an enforced period of celibacy (six months? nine? forever?) seemed like a viable option when weighed against the tediousness of overeager dogs, offers of free automobiles, stoned reluctant transsexual fuckers and men who indiscriminately show off their penises in the Starbuck’s parking lot.

Really, celibacy seems preferable, right?

Nevertheless, I sent out some feelers and after a not unreasonable time ended up with plans to meet an intriguing gentleman at the local coffee shop one Friday night. For ninety minutes we discussed families, children, science, religion, politics and sex. The conversation and his intelligent hazel eyes gave me girlie-wood and a brain hard-on all at once. I won’t go so far as to say I was smitten, but I was definitely interested.

“You know,” he said as the evening drew to a close, “there’s really only one thing wrong with you.”

Here it comes, I thought. Here’s where yet another rejection shatters my fragile little ego into ten-thousand shards and I’m forced to spend a week binding up the metaphorical wounds. What would it be, I wondered. What aspect of my physical or mental make-up would he proclaim abhorrent?

Thirty of my most prominent failures, foibles and faults shot through my mind in such vivid detail that I nearly missed what he said next — something about my car? And the stickers on it? And how his preference in football teams was at odds with mine?

I’m ashamed to quantify the relief I felt that his only issue was with stickers on a car that’s not even mine. Clearly my ego needs some toughening up before I’m really ready to be dating again.

Find Me Here



Receive Updates Via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner