<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the &#8220;In&#8221; Crowd and Sex Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/</link>
	<description>~ videamus quid sit exilium. nempe loci commutatio.~</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aag</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25544</link>
		<dc:creator>aag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25544</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, it seems as though they&#039;re just ignoring it all. The piece was up last time I checked, and the author was still churning out words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it seems as though they&#8217;re just ignoring it all. The piece was up last time I checked, and the author was still churning out words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elodie</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25543</link>
		<dc:creator>Elodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25543</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can’t write something intentionally offensive and expect people to not be offended by it.&quot;

THIS. Unless you expect people -- women in particular -- to be doormats.

People like the author of that offensive, unfunny, ignorant and poorly-written Liberator thing can dish it out but they can&#039;t take it. I have zero respect for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can’t write something intentionally offensive and expect people to not be offended by it.&#8221;</p>
<p>THIS. Unless you expect people &#8212; women in particular &#8212; to be doormats.</p>
<p>People like the author of that offensive, unfunny, ignorant and poorly-written Liberator thing can dish it out but they can&#8217;t take it. I have zero respect for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Blackheart</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25530</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Blackheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25530</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know you were one of the &#039;negative, snarky&#039; ones until this comment, for what its worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know you were one of the &#8216;negative, snarky&#8217; ones until this comment, for what its worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarahbear</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25520</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarahbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25520</guid>
		<description>Tit for tat, dude.

Liberator&#039;s article was entitled &quot;Bad Pussy: Brutal Honesty from Guys&quot;. Anyone who responded via a pissed-the-fuck-off e-mail, blog post or comment was just returning the favor. I&#039;m sorry, but when a guy (who is also a doctor) writes publicly about how disgusted he is by having to see his patients vulva and &#039;ass so monstrous you could park a truck in it&#039; or how grossed out he is by long labia, why is it then the readers responsibility to put a lid on their outrage and politely e-mail anyone? 

You can&#039;t write something intentionally offensive and expect people to not be offended by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tit for tat, dude.</p>
<p>Liberator&#8217;s article was entitled &#8220;Bad Pussy: Brutal Honesty from Guys&#8221;. Anyone who responded via a pissed-the-fuck-off e-mail, blog post or comment was just returning the favor. I&#8217;m sorry, but when a guy (who is also a doctor) writes publicly about how disgusted he is by having to see his patients vulva and &#8216;ass so monstrous you could park a truck in it&#8217; or how grossed out he is by long labia, why is it then the readers responsibility to put a lid on their outrage and politely e-mail anyone? </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t write something intentionally offensive and expect people to not be offended by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PandaDementia</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25519</link>
		<dc:creator>PandaDementia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25519</guid>
		<description>You said the &quot;in&quot; crowd sounds lonely, I was simply posing a theory as to why that may be.  If that came out as snarky, that wasn&#039;t my intention.

I have no complaints, I was just responding to your query about the &quot;in&quot; crowd. It sounded like you were actually looking for an explanation from those who see it that way. If that wasn&#039;t the case, then I apologize for making the wrong assumption.

Not at all sure where you get the &quot;insecure&quot; portion of your claim, but let me assure you that&#039;s not the case. As far as being snarky, I&#039;ve never claimed to be the paragon of innocence, but I always try to approach a subject with respectful deference before indulging in snark (which I hope you can agree is what I did with my first comment to the post). Something that I believe separates me from some others.

And thank you for your concern about my wellbeing, but I can also assure you that I have no problem making friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said the &#8220;in&#8221; crowd sounds lonely, I was simply posing a theory as to why that may be.  If that came out as snarky, that wasn&#8217;t my intention.</p>
<p>I have no complaints, I was just responding to your query about the &#8220;in&#8221; crowd. It sounded like you were actually looking for an explanation from those who see it that way. If that wasn&#8217;t the case, then I apologize for making the wrong assumption.</p>
<p>Not at all sure where you get the &#8220;insecure&#8221; portion of your claim, but let me assure you that&#8217;s not the case. As far as being snarky, I&#8217;ve never claimed to be the paragon of innocence, but I always try to approach a subject with respectful deference before indulging in snark (which I hope you can agree is what I did with my first comment to the post). Something that I believe separates me from some others.</p>
<p>And thank you for your concern about my wellbeing, but I can also assure you that I have no problem making friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PandaDementia</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25518</link>
		<dc:creator>PandaDementia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25518</guid>
		<description>You assume that you&#039;re included as one of the &quot;negative, snarky&quot; ones because you&#039;ve been called those things before by a great deal of others. That&#039;s none of my doing.
You being attacked by others OUTSIDE of this blog post has NOTHING to do with what&#039;s being said IN this blog post. We were all giving our input of AAG&#039;s query objectively and without attacking individual people. Assuming that you are implied in the attack is not a just reason for calling people names, IMO, but then again, it&#039;s AAG&#039;s blog and if she wants to allow it, that&#039;s up to her.
As far as me being ONLY critical of you, I believe that you focus on the criticisms because that&#039;s where the drama lies. You conveniently forget the times that I&#039;ve left supportive comments, that I&#039;ve asked non-attacking questions on Formspring, that I&#039;ve RT&#039;d your tweets about blog posts, etc. Have those positive things come lately? No, not at all, because 1) since you&#039;re only focused on the negative, I realize that it doesn&#039;t matter what I do, you&#039;re always going to treat me like the enemy and 2) I&#039;ve become wholly exhausted of your hypocrisy &amp; drama.
I have stayed away from your blog in the past couple of months because I am done feeling sad for you &amp; the only times I&#039;ve responded to your comments on other blogs were when you were attacking the people you were commenting about.
You continue doing that, and I&#039;ll continue responding to it, but other than that, I will ignore you as you do me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You assume that you&#8217;re included as one of the &#8220;negative, snarky&#8221; ones because you&#8217;ve been called those things before by a great deal of others. That&#8217;s none of my doing.<br />
You being attacked by others OUTSIDE of this blog post has NOTHING to do with what&#8217;s being said IN this blog post. We were all giving our input of AAG&#8217;s query objectively and without attacking individual people. Assuming that you are implied in the attack is not a just reason for calling people names, IMO, but then again, it&#8217;s AAG&#8217;s blog and if she wants to allow it, that&#8217;s up to her.<br />
As far as me being ONLY critical of you, I believe that you focus on the criticisms because that&#8217;s where the drama lies. You conveniently forget the times that I&#8217;ve left supportive comments, that I&#8217;ve asked non-attacking questions on Formspring, that I&#8217;ve RT&#8217;d your tweets about blog posts, etc. Have those positive things come lately? No, not at all, because 1) since you&#8217;re only focused on the negative, I realize that it doesn&#8217;t matter what I do, you&#8217;re always going to treat me like the enemy and 2) I&#8217;ve become wholly exhausted of your hypocrisy &amp; drama.<br />
I have stayed away from your blog in the past couple of months because I am done feeling sad for you &amp; the only times I&#8217;ve responded to your comments on other blogs were when you were attacking the people you were commenting about.<br />
You continue doing that, and I&#8217;ll continue responding to it, but other than that, I will ignore you as you do me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aag</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25517</link>
		<dc:creator>aag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25517</guid>
		<description>&quot;And maybe that’s why the “in” crowd has become so incredibly snarky lately: they’re miserable and lonely.&quot;

You may not have used profanity, but I certainly count this sweet little gem as name-calling.

Panda, I&#039;m not sure what your major complaint is but I&#039;ve got to tell you -- you&#039;re coming off as incredibly snarky and insecure in your posts on this thread. If you want to get along with people in the sex-blogging world or any other portion of the world, my advice would be to check yourself for the very things you&#039;re criticizing in others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And maybe that’s why the “in” crowd has become so incredibly snarky lately: they’re miserable and lonely.&#8221;</p>
<p>You may not have used profanity, but I certainly count this sweet little gem as name-calling.</p>
<p>Panda, I&#8217;m not sure what your major complaint is but I&#8217;ve got to tell you &#8212; you&#8217;re coming off as incredibly snarky and insecure in your posts on this thread. If you want to get along with people in the sex-blogging world or any other portion of the world, my advice would be to check yourself for the very things you&#8217;re criticizing in others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britni TheVadgeWig</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25516</link>
		<dc:creator>Britni TheVadgeWig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25516</guid>
		<description>Just because no one has mentioned my name outright doesn&#039;t mean that I don&#039;t know that I&#039;m one of the implied &quot;negative, snarky&quot; etc. ones. And that isn&#039;t name calling?

I&#039;ve been called out and attacked in comments sections of posts that have nothing to do with me and aren&#039;t on my blog. I&#039;ve been called more names than you can even imagine. How is me telling someone (to their face) that I think they&#039;re mean, because they&#039;ve been OUTRIGHT mean to me and questioned my ability as a mental health professional, my ability to watch children, my mental health, called me a drug addict, and countless other things &quot;calling names?&quot;

And why is it that you only seem to comment on my blog or reply to comments on many others (and, before I blocked you on Twitter and Facebook, there, too) when you have something critical to say about me? Find someone else to attack, please. I&#039;ve heard your criticisms enough, and I get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because no one has mentioned my name outright doesn&#8217;t mean that I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;m one of the implied &#8220;negative, snarky&#8221; etc. ones. And that isn&#8217;t name calling?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been called out and attacked in comments sections of posts that have nothing to do with me and aren&#8217;t on my blog. I&#8217;ve been called more names than you can even imagine. How is me telling someone (to their face) that I think they&#8217;re mean, because they&#8217;ve been OUTRIGHT mean to me and questioned my ability as a mental health professional, my ability to watch children, my mental health, called me a drug addict, and countless other things &#8220;calling names?&#8221;</p>
<p>And why is it that you only seem to comment on my blog or reply to comments on many others (and, before I blocked you on Twitter and Facebook, there, too) when you have something critical to say about me? Find someone else to attack, please. I&#8217;ve heard your criticisms enough, and I get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aag</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25515</link>
		<dc:creator>aag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25515</guid>
		<description>The &quot;attack&quot; was never on your wife or the author of that post. 

The CRITICISM was on the *idea* that gushing was disgusting. People were upset about the expressed *opinion* that there was something gross about that physiological response -- which was not satire and was not, at least to me, even a little bit funny.

Sadly, I feel that trying to explain this to you any further is a waste of my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;attack&#8221; was never on your wife or the author of that post. </p>
<p>The CRITICISM was on the *idea* that gushing was disgusting. People were upset about the expressed *opinion* that there was something gross about that physiological response &#8212; which was not satire and was not, at least to me, even a little bit funny.</p>
<p>Sadly, I feel that trying to explain this to you any further is a waste of my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britni TheVadgeWig</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/06/04/in-crowd-sex-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-25514</link>
		<dc:creator>Britni TheVadgeWig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8988#comment-25514</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t attack your wife. I attacked the article that was written (not by your wife). That wasn&#039;t a personal attack at anyone.

And what about Epiphora? She commented on a post I wrote about role play, had never spoken to you, and you repeatedly called her a pedophile on Twitter. What grenade did she throw at you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t attack your wife. I attacked the article that was written (not by your wife). That wasn&#8217;t a personal attack at anyone.</p>
<p>And what about Epiphora? She commented on a post I wrote about role play, had never spoken to you, and you repeatedly called her a pedophile on Twitter. What grenade did she throw at you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

