<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A red herring, a misdirection, a distraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aagblog.com/2010/05/25/edenfantasys-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/05/25/edenfantasys-problems/</link>
	<description>~ videamus quid sit exilium. nempe loci commutatio.~</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyor</title>
		<link>http://aagblog.com/2010/05/25/edenfantasys-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-25255</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aagblog.com/?p=8936#comment-25255</guid>
		<description>Just to address the JavaScript comment -- I&#039;m pretty sure JavaScript is the way of the present and the past, not the future. We&#039;ve had JavaScript used for years and years now, for as long as I can remember... so the &quot;way of the future&quot; argument is bullshit on their part.

I hope they change their ways, for their future (?) contributors&#039; sakes... but from what I can tell as this has unfolded, they have already done irreparable harm to their image through nothing else than their own shortcomings and failings, as well as their general lack of respect for their contributors.

Again, I&#039;m an outsider who doesn&#039;t know the situation aside from what you&#039;ve told us, but I trust you, AAG, and I don&#039;t think you&#039;d be complaining or whistleblowing if it weren&#039;t important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to address the JavaScript comment &#8212; I&#8217;m pretty sure JavaScript is the way of the present and the past, not the future. We&#8217;ve had JavaScript used for years and years now, for as long as I can remember&#8230; so the &#8220;way of the future&#8221; argument is bullshit on their part.</p>
<p>I hope they change their ways, for their future (?) contributors&#8217; sakes&#8230; but from what I can tell as this has unfolded, they have already done irreparable harm to their image through nothing else than their own shortcomings and failings, as well as their general lack of respect for their contributors.</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m an outsider who doesn&#8217;t know the situation aside from what you&#8217;ve told us, but I trust you, AAG, and I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d be complaining or whistleblowing if it weren&#8217;t important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

