Aug 312009
 

So ardently did I believe my family to be complete after my two girls arrived that I did not consider the question of circumcision. I did not consider the question of circumcision even when my daughter’s birth mother later delivered a boy. That boy was not mine to raise, I thought then, so what did my personal snipping opinions matter?

But within weeks he was coming to live with me. “Make sure to get him circumcised,” his mother told me on the way out the door. “The hospital never got around to it when he was born, so you have to take him in soon.” The vehemence of my unspoken response startled me. There is no way in hell I’m taking this baby in for an unnecessary procedure, I thought to myself. If you want him to be cut then you can comfort him during and after the procedure.

Nevertheless, I asked his new doctor about it the first time she met the boy. She flipped through my hastily-gathered pile of paperwork. “He’s only three days shy of a month. I don’t perform circumcisions, and you’re going to have a hard time finding any other doctor willing to do one on a baby this age. Before one month they use no anesthetic, but he’s to the point that they’d have trouble keeping him still during the procedure.”

My stomach went queasy. “Then can we schedule it after he’s a month old, when he can have anesthetic?”

She shook her head. “I wouldn’t recommend it. There’s no medical reason to circumcise him at this point, so why subject him to anesthetic he doesn’t need?”

As time has passed I’ve grown more and more comfortable with the idea that the boy should make up his own mind about circumcision. When he gets to be a teenager — ideally, before he’s sexually active — he can find out what current medical research says about the role of the foreskin in pleasure and disease transmission. With his father’s and my guidance he can decide for himself how to approach the risks and benefits of circumcision, and if he wants to pursue the operation we’ll gladly help him set it up and pay for it.

With that thought in mind, I’m bothered to read that CDC is considering recommending routine infant circumcision based on studies done in Africa which show that circumcision reduces the infection risk by half for heterosexual men who have sex with HIV positive women. I question many things about the applicability of this study but nothing more so than that the potential recommendation targets infants.

Parents of course have the right (within legal limits) to raise their children as they see fit. But for the life of me I can find no logical reason why circumcision should be recommended for day-old babies who are many years away from engaging in the types of behaviors which would put them at risk for HIV and other infections.

“But it also lowers the risk of penile cancer!” people like to mention when the topic of circumcision comes up, but the fact is that this type of cancer is extraordinarily rare in the US. Only 0.2% of cancers in men and 0.1% of cancer deaths in men in the United States are from penile cancer. Contrast this with the fact that 16% of US men will face prostate cancer in their lifetimes — and yet we do not remove the prostate at birth. Or the fact that 12% of US women will develop breast cancer in their lifetimes — and yet we do not remove breast tissue at birth.

“Of course we shouldn’t remove the prostate or the breasts at birth!” you must be thinking. “Why permanently alter someone who hasn’t consented to it for theoretical protection against diseases they don’t have and might never get?

And that is exactly my point.

I’ll be interested to see what the CDC says in their recommendations due out by the end of the year. If they do find reason to recommend circumcision as a way to lower HIV infection risk, I’d like some justification for why it should be done to infants instead of to those who are nearing sexual maturity.

Thoughts? Opinions? I’d particularly like to hear from men. If you knew circumcision was likely to reduce risk, would you want to be circumcised yourself? Would you have it done to an infant son? Or would you wait to see what research said when he was older?

Sound off below.

Aug 302009
 

via queermenow.net

Aug 302009
 

via 13.media.tumblr.com

Aug 302009
 

via paris2009.drupalcon.org

Aug 302009
 

via fc03.deviantart.com

 

Hey!

Brag in the comments below about your favorite piece of work that appeared in the past week. Tell us about:

  • a blog post you wrote
  • a blog post someone else wrote
  • a post that deserves more comments
  • a comment that needs a rebuttal
  • a Tumblr blog you find interesting
  • whatever else your heart desires

Leave a little description so we know what we’re clicking on, please.

And spread the word!

Aug 292009
 

via fc00.deviantart.com

Aug 292009
 

via fc07.deviantart.com

Aug 282009
 

via 20.media.tumblr.com

 

The headline announced it so breathlessly I could almost imagine the author twitching with flagitious glee: “The United Nations is recommending that children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach even pre-kindergarteners about masturbation and topics like gender violence.”

Lest you’re tempted to believe that the UN’s aim is to create a class of tiny sexbots, read more and you’ll find that the headline actually refers to an age-appropriate sexuality curriculum that can be used world-wide and which promotes autonomy, safety and health.

Despite Fox’s loud rhetoric I thought that sounded like a marvelous plan. Masturbation is a topic which comes up in my house (go figure) at least weekly (we talk about “gender violence” too I suppose, but that usually takes the form of “please stop beating your brother”), so I was curious to read more. I dug up a pdf of the complete curriculum; page 54 discusses Sex, Sexuality and the Sexual Life Cycle with these talking points for 5-8 year olds:

• Most children are curious about their bodies
• It is natural to explore and touch parts of one’s own body
• Bodies can feel good when touched
• Touching and rubbing one’s genitals is called masturbation
• Some people masturbate and some do not
• Masturbation is not harmful, but should be done in private

Hell yeah I want my kids to learn this. In fact they already have, even the one who is fifteen months younger than the UNESCO suggested age range. I’d go so far as to say that I’d like every child to hear this lesson; the ones raised in profoundly anti-wank homes especially need to be told by someone trustworthy that while not everyone masturbates, it’s certainly not going to kill you, send you straight to hell or make your hoo-ha shrivel up.

Teaching a child about masturbation effectively says, “You own your body. You are the one who gets to make choices about what happens to it.” Loophole-alerts preschoolers (I can name some who live with me) will need to be reminded that their rights end where their neighbors’ bodies begin and therefore they cannot bop siblings on the head, pull the cat’s tail or refuse vaccinations. This is a good lesson too; in fact it is the very foundation of the idea that no means NO.

I was twenty-seven years old before I knew in my heart that my body was my own. Writing that sentence makes me remember how horribly painful it was to realize that I was wrong all the years I thought that my body existed only to make other people happy. I’m still learning that lesson today. Bet I would have figured it out sooner if it had been mentioned regularly in school.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that physicians discuss masturbation as a normal part of children’s lives right from the start. Even ultra-conservative James Dobson allows that masturbation in young children (and older children, and adults) is not of itself a concern. It makes me sick and very, very sad to think there are people who would oppose a matter-of-fact lesson that only acknowledges the facts of masturbation, but they exist — and they loudly demand that schools should teach (or not teach) only their faith-based beliefs.

Um, don’t read those comments without a having on hand a stiff drink and possibly an implement with which to perform your very own self-lobotomy. Actually, don’t worry about anything but the drink. You’ll need nothing but the comments themselves to give you that lobotomy.

So now I turn it over to you. Can you give me even one rational reason for not teaching Kindergartners about masturbation? If your child were enrolled in a class teaching the UNESCO curriculum, would you object?

Find Me Here



Receive Updates Via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner